DMR Eligibility Decison by H.O. Hudgins 10 18 04
Appeal denied by Commissioner on October 26, 2004
Keyword: intellectual function, subset score discrepancy, lack of global deficits
Hearing Officer: Marcia A. Hudgins
Counsel present for Appellant: No
Counsel present for DMR: David Fleischman
Appellant present: Yes
Hearing Officer Decision on October 18, 2004
The appellant had been diagnosed with Williams syndrome. No formal ABAS results were presented.
Year |
Test |
Age |
Score |
Diagnosis in report |
||
Verb. |
Perf. |
Full |
||||
1998 |
WISC-III |
15 |
75 |
53 |
62 |
The examiner noted that although the appellant was well spoken equivalent to her age, the content was not matched to the subject. He concluded that her mental abilities fell below the average range. |
2001 |
WAIS-III |
18 |
84 |
70 |
76 |
The report stated that the appellant had a complex set of learning disabilities. |
2004 |
WAIS-III |
21 |
88 |
77 |
81 |
The examiner stated that the appellant's mental abilities remained stable. |
The 2003 IEP stated that the appellant functioned in the deficient range of cognitive ability. The DMR expert noted that the appellant had a longstanding diagnosis of Williams syndrome and that some developmental delays were associated with that disorder. In addition, he stated that the 1998 testing was not reliable because the examiner did not give any behavioral observations nor did she make a comment concerning validity. Based on other test reports, the expert concluded that the appellant had a learning disability.
The hearing officer found that the appellant was not mentally retarded. She stated that the IQ score of 62 was not valid because there was a greater than 20-point discrepancy. She also questioned its validity and stated that the appellant had definite deficits but they were not global in nature.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Hudgins decision 10-18-04 WO AH_1.pdf (4.92 MB) | 4.92 MB |